The result is our waaay more than 1-2 pages loooong report. :) It is very text-based with not so much graphical elements, except for some tables and charts.
After the team was formed, our first task was topic selection. We were
three different people with three different ideas. After a well-organized
voting on Google docs we have selected the topic.
Guidelines were simple: ”The voting can be simple. Each person has 6
points. You can give them to one idea, to two or to all three[1].
You cannot vote for your idea. Let's see which one wins. You can give all 6
points to one idea. Or spread points equally 2, 2, and 2. Or 4 and 2. Or like I
did: 3, 2, and 1. And so on.”
Table 1: Voting for the topic
Topic
|
||||
Name
|
Airlines
|
Music
|
Games
|
Social Media
|
H. K.
|
x
|
|||
Vlad Meghes
|
0
|
2
|
x
|
4
|
Veronika
Lazareva
|
x
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
Sebastjan
Brezovec
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
x
|
TOTAL
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
8
|
With the topic selected, we have formed the research questions and
divided them among group members. After Hyerim Kwon left the group our team had
three members only and each member has defined 2 research questions. Later,
when Satu has joined, she added 2 more, but we decided that 7, being a magic
number, should suffice.
Hope you will enjoy reading our findings.
[1] At the time of voting our team included H. K. who later left
the team.
USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA BY SOCIAL MEDIA
THE CASE OF FACEBOOK,
TWITTER, AND YOUTUBE
Sebastjan Brezovec
Veronika Lazareva
Satu Mattila
Vlad Meghes
Research report
March 2014
EVA Social Media Course 2014
Tampere University of Applied
Sciences
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Research objectives
The main purpose of the research is to analyze
three Social Media platforms, and their activities on the Internet, as well as
how do they use competitors’ platforms in content promotion and advertising. We
have decided to compare the following Social Media websites: Facebook,
Twitter and YouTube, as they represent three different community/content
platforms:
- Facebook – social networking
- Twitter – micro-blogging
- YouTube – video-content sharing
The first part of the research is aimed at
briefly analyzing the demographic representation on the websites, as well as
the type of functions they use. This part also shows the correlation between
the platforms and similarities of the content provided.
Then the overall activity on Facebook and
Twitter is investigated more in depth for all three companies. This has been
done in order to get the basic idea of what for and how actively do the
researched companies use Social Media websites.
As for the third part, the research examines
the opportunities for community building. How well is worldwide Internet trend
organized and supported on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube?
Or are there no signs of any community building
at all?
2 DESCRIPTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA
2.1 Facebook
Facebook is an online social
networking service. As of September 2012, Facebook has over one billion active
users.
People on Facebook can interact with each other using the following
methods:
·
Messaging (all messages are contained within single threads in a unified inbox),
·
Voice calls (live voice calls via Facebook Chat, allowing users to chat with others
from all over the world; also service also allows users to leave voice messages
on Facebook).
·
Video calling,
·
Following (via "Follow" button, which allows users to subscribe to
public postings by the user without needing to add them as a friend).
The most distinguished feature of Facebook is its Like button, allowing
users to express their appreciation of content, such as status updates,
comments and media (photos, videos).
2.2 YouTube
YouTube is a video-sharing website that belongs
to Google since 2006. The main purpose of the platform is community building
around user-generated video content. It was founded on February 14, 2005 by
Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim. Their slogan from 2005 till 2012 was
“Broadcast Yourself”. It is available in 61 language versions.
Registration is optional (Only required for certain tasks such as
uploading videos, viewing flagged videos, viewing flagged comments, liking
videos, adding videos to playlists and commenting on videos). It is on a third
position of Alexa ranking (as on March, 2014).
2.3 Twitter
Twitter is an online social network
that allows its users to communicate through messages. It is a platform that is
growing constantly reaching over 200 million users on February 2013. Each user
can post messages (tweets) to let their friends and other users that use
Twitter, know the latest news.
The following features allow people to interact with each other, and
share their news with other members:
· Direct messaging that can be used to send a private
message to another user. This can be done by adding their handle (username) to
the tweet. For example if a user wants to send a private message to another
user, he will have to add the receiver's username to the post in this form:
@username.
· Friend request feature is slightly different than on the other networks. Twitter uses
a follow system which allows the users to see the latest tweets of the people
they follow on news feed. People that follow each other are considered to be
friends, not just followers.
· Image and video sharing through tweets were added in November 2011. Until this date, images and videos could only
be viewed on external websites, through the link provided in the tweet. Ever
since November 2011, Twitter allows its users to view videos and images inside
the Twitter website.
· Twitter utilizes hashtags to group posts into categories,
making it easier for people to follow certain interests and categories by
viewing that specific hashtag page. Users who want their tweet to be shown in a
specific category can add into their tweet that hashtag in the following form:
#hashtag
· The most important feature that
makes Twitter different than other social networks is the fact that they allow messages to be only 140 characters long,
making its users post brief and concise messages.
3 TOPIC SELECTION & RESEARCH QUESTIONS
After the team was formed, our first task was topic selection. We were
three different people with three different ideas. After a well-organized
voting on Google docs we have selected the topic.
Guidelines were simple: ”The voting can be simple. Each person has 6
points. You can give them to one idea, to two or to all three[1].
You cannot vote for your idea. Let's see which one wins. You can give all 6
points to one idea. Or spread points equally 2, 2, and 2. Or 4 and 2. Or like I
did: 3, 2, and 1. And so on.”
Table 1: Voting for the topic
Topic
|
||||
Name
|
Airlines
|
Music
|
Games
|
Social Media
|
Hyerim Kwon
|
x
|
|||
Vlad Meghes
|
0
|
2
|
x
|
4
|
Veronika
Lazareva
|
x
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
Sebastjan
Brezovec
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
x
|
TOTAL
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
8
|
With the topic selected, we have formed the research questions and
divided them among group members. After Hyerim Kwon left the group our team had
three members only and each member has defined 2 research questions. Later,
when Satu has joined, she added 2 more, but we decided that 7, being a magic
number, should suffice.
Research questions:
1
Who uses
what? Demographic distribution on Social Media platforms?
2
How do
researched companies use other Social Media platforms?
3
When were
Facebook pages founded?
4
Is there
any difference in the content of the Facebook page between the three Social
Media companies?
5
How many
Tweets on average do the researched companies produce per day (average of the
last week)?
6
Can you
spot the similarities and differences in the use of Facebook, Twitter, and
YouTube among the three companies?
7
Are there signs of community building somewhere? Is there any kind of
noticeable community building in the chosen social media areas, what kind?
4 RESEARCH RESULTS
4.1 Who uses what? Demographic distribution on Social Media platforms
Table 2: Demographic distribution on Social Media
platforms.
Social Media
|
Number of users[2]
|
Gender statistics[3]
|
Average user age[4]
|
Facebook
|
1,23 billion (29.01.2014)
|
Male
43% - Female 57%.
|
30
|
Twitter
|
243 million (05.02.2014)
|
Male 41% - Female 59%.
|
28-year-old female
|
YouTube
|
1 billion, 4 billion views per day
(20.03.2014)
|
Male 54% - Female 46%
|
18 to 29
|
4.2 How do researched companies use other Social Media platforms?
Table 3: Social Media platforms’ used of other Social Media
Social Media
|
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
YouTube
|
Facebook
|
143,855,055 likes
|
13.6 M Followers
|
185,840 Subs
|
Twitter
|
11,731,854 likes
|
29.5 M Followers
|
48,655 Subs
|
YouTube
|
78,831,858 likes
|
40.6 M Followers
|
22,001,902 Subs *
|
*YouTube
Spotlight channel
4.2.1 Company: Facebook
·
Facebook: Company uses their own website
mostly for announcing updates, sometimes posting inspirational quotes on
special days (for example, NBA Finals, International Women’s Day, MLK Day,
etc.) They also share company’s news and activity pretty regularly (for
example, participating in Pride 2013).
·
Twitter: Facebook uses Twitter micro-blogging platform the
same way they use their official Facebook page: almost all of the tweets are
promotions and announcements, sometimes reposts/retweets from Instagram (that
belongs to Facebook as well). No interaction with users on an official
Twitter-account.
·
YouTube: Company has pretty
decent YouTube account, which they maintain quite regularly by posting videos
at least twice a month. Videos on the channel are mainly tutorials on how to
use Facebook mobile apps, commercials, as well as announcements and etc. All
the videos are usually less than a minute long.
4.2.2 Company: Twitter
·
Twitter: “Your official source for news, updates and tips from
Twitter, Inc.” says the heading of Twitter account. Company is pretty actively
uses their own platform, tweeting announcements and news, as well as retweeting
from other Twitter accounts (Twitter Movies, Twitter eng, etc.) creating
correlation and common awareness of the social media platform’s updates.
·
Facebook: Twitter has an official Facebook
page, as well as some non-official community pages. They mostly promote
Twitter-content, that is popular that day, reposting some trending topics and
sharing pictures and company news and announcements. There is an app to connect
your Twitter account to Facebook too.
·
YouTube: Company uses
YouTube for posting announcements and updates, interviews with Twitter officials,
as well as statistics videos, and videos about special events like Emmy Awards
2013, Tweets to Neil Armstrong. Usually they produce one video a month.
4.2.3 YouTube
·
YouTube: YouTube, as expected, has several
channels for different needs (YouTube for Creators, YouTube Help, YouTube for
Developers, etc.) Their YouTube Spotlight channel is mainly about
announcements, meaningful events for YouTube community, special own
productions, etc.
·
Twitter: YouTube uses Twitter for posting popular videos of
the day, that’s why they are pretty active on a daily basis. Almost every tweet
contents a link to a YouTube video.
·
Facebook: Same
purposes as with their Twitter account: posting viral and promoting popular
videos on their Timeline.
4.3 When were Facebook pages founded?
Facebook: Founded on 4 February 2004
YouTube: Founded in 2005
Twitter: Founded in March 2006
The comparison shows what was
expected. Facebook has its page since the day one. We have to take this
information with a pinch of salt. Facebook was a closed community at the
beginning and was only open to selected university- and high-school students.
If we disregard the
shortcoming of Facebook not being open to everyone, we can still spot the fact
that the earlier the Social Media’s Facebook page was created, the more users
(Likes) it has (See Figure 1).
4.4 Is there any difference in the content of the Facebook page between the three Social Media companies?
4.4.1 Facebook
Likes: 143,813,408 (143,8
million)
What surprised me
on the Facebook main page is how rarely it is updated. The most recent posts
are presented in Table 4.
Table 4: Most recent updated on Facebook’s Facebook
page
Date
|
Content
|
March 19, 2014
|
News about updated design (News
Feed with bigger stories and a simpler design)
|
March 8, 2014
|
Celebrate International #WomensDay
|
February 13, 2014
|
Invitation to download new
sticker pack:
|
February 5, 2014
|
A Look Back. A short movie about own presence on
Facebook. A mega hit among users.
|
4.4.2 Twitter
Website: https://www.facebook.com/twitterinc
Likes: 11,726,421
(11,7 million)
Twitter also doesn’t update its
Facebook page very regularly, but still more often than Facebook updating its
page. Twitter’s Facebook page receives on average a post every two to three
days.
I expected Twitter posts to be
shorter to reflect their main differentiating point - namely posting short,
concise messages. Most of the messages are short - following the 140 character
policy, but not all. The post dating to March 20 is a whopping 190 characters
long! This is 36% more than limit on Twitter.
4.4.3 YouTube
Likes: 78,826,352
(78,8 million)
As expected for a YouTube page there
are lots of YouTube videos present on the page. There are two to three updates
to the page every day. There are only videos, no other content, like status
updates or photos.
I have checked the
numbers of followers on Twitter. The picture is surprisingly different. YouTube
has many more followers on Twitter than the other two. Also Twitter is
relatively more popular on Twitter compared to other 2 SoMe than on Facebook.
4.5 How many Tweets on average do the researched companies produce per day (average of the last week)?
Facebook is not a very active company when it comes to
their own pages. As I could see on Twitter, Facebook barely makes 1 tweet per
week, 2 at most. In the last month, they posted 4 tweets and a re-tweet from
Instagram.
Twitter on the other hand is a lot more
active when it comes to tweets. In the past week they posted 4 tweets and a
re-tweet. That is the same amount of tweets as Facebook did in a month. In
March, Twitter posted 12 tweets in total. (http://twitter.com/twitter)
YouTube is by far the most active on
Twitter, they posted 37 tweets in the past week. They post on average about 8
tweets per day. (http://twitter.com/youtube)
4.6 Can you spot the similarities and differences in the use of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube among the three companies.
From my experience and what I
realized after researching these three companies is the fact that all three are
used for advertising and promoting products or services. Facebook and YouTube
are preferred by other companies to promote their services or products, but
Twitter is catching up. There are websites that offer advertising through
twitter and the client pays the amount according to the number of Followers the
seller has.
This is a good concept that will help companies
to promote their products or services even cheaper than before. Here is an
example: http://www.paywithatweet.com/
Facebook and Twitter offer the possibility to
upload pictures. From this research I found out Facebook is used mostly by
younger persons and that Twitter's users is inclined more towards the middle
aged persons. As for YouTube, it is used by every age groups, gender or
location.
Another difference between all these social
media is the fact that YouTube gives their users the possibility to share and
promote their video on other social media sites. For example, you can share
your YouTube video on Facebook, Twitter or other websites through the share and
embed options.
YouTube has recently introduced the new comment
system that is handled by Google+, making it easier for people to keep track of
comments on their Google account.
4.7 Are there signs of community building somewhere? Is there any kind of noticeable community building in the chosen social media areas, what kind?
In Facebook, it's
easy to spot a lot of community building. Every band, every movie, every game
has their own official fan-pages, where the people interested of the content join
and have conversations. Because community is described as a social unit that shares
the same common values, we can make a conclusion that Facebook is full of
different kinds of little communities with their own interests and values.
Community pages and
groups in Facebook are very popular way nowadays to talk about stuff, and it
almost seems that they make better communities nowadays than what discussion
forums were in the earlier days. Even Facebook itself has its own community in
the page. So Facebook has a lot of community building daily!
In YouTube, there are
also many different kinds of communities. Although, the fan base of certain
account may have same interests and talk about them in the published videos
comment fields, but that does not seem as strong community building as what it
is on Facebook. The commenting is kind of random act and does not make as
strong feeling of a group as what Facebook does.
The funny fact is,
that behind all the basic knowledge many of us 'random users' have of YouTube, it
seems that YouTube actually encourages you to build your own community! Communities
are very big part of building your audience and fan base in YouTube. YouTube
gives you tips how to build your own community in the following page: http://www.youtube.com/yt/playbook/community.html
So as a matter of
fact, Youtube also has a lot of signs of community building inside of it.
What about Twitter
then? Community building seems more business-like than the other two research
objects. Community building in Twitter is more clear, if the account that is
followed, tweets about few specific topics related to the interest of the
followers. As there is no general place to make 'home' for your community and
find people with same interests at one location, one needs to be active. If no
one starts the talk, there will not be community to build.
Following and
recommending some accounts and talking about the content to others in their
tweets is the mainly community building way in Twitter. Also retweeting is a big
part of community getting to grow. Here is a link to page that tells you how to
build your own twitter community:
5 CONCLUSIONS
Since Facebook became available to general
public, Social Media are growing exponentially.
Facebook is still the most used social media channel, but as researched, YouTube
and Twitter have also reached millions of people around the world. Even if
these companies may find each other as competitors, they still use each other’s
pages to promote themselves.
As Facebook was published in
2004, YouTube kicked-off their personal page in there in 2005. Facebook uses
Twitter and Twitter publishes videos in YouTube. It's a nice circle of social-media-life
between the companies. The
research has shown that the three social media companies have pretty high
social media activity, as we expected. Some expectations about the activity may
have been proven wrong, but otherwise the researched social media companies are
keeping their heads up in the SoMe world.
As these three companies may have the same
category - Social media, - they have different contents. Facebook is known for
social networking, Twitter is a place for micro-blogging, and YouTube is intended
for video-content sharing. Even if these companies have very different main
content, they also have a lot of common features. Accounts can be followed,
comments can be written and media content can be shared. So different, but
still so similar in more than one way.
These three companies take a big part in Internet
community building, as they have so many users. All of the researched companies
are taking care that people react to each other, have conversations and find
out same kind of people to rely on and connect with. Communities are nowadays
mainly built in Internet world in one way or another, and social media
companies might take the biggest responsibility for that. They encourage their
users to build and join communities, and that's a very positive trend.
So what is the resolution in
our research on these three companies, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube? These
Social Media companies are keeping us active and helping us finding multiple
ways to expand our social life and grow communities. They are showing us an
example how to promote one-self in other social media platforms, and offer us
different ways to keep on board the internet. In social media world, you are
never alone.
[1] At the time of voting our team included Hyerim Kwon, who later left
the team.
[2] http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/resource-how-many-people-use-the-top-social-media/2/#.UzAi81f5P3q
[3] http://mashable.com/2012/03/09/social-media-demographics/
[4] http://blog.zogdigital.com/2013/05/01/social-media-marketing-101-network-user-demographics/
Wow! That's kind of impressive. I might read that at some point but now I only read conclusion due to the fact that is waaaay to long for a blog post. :) And unfortunately in conclusion there were nothing that would have been surprising and thus very interesting. Is there any possibility that you could make a shorter version with some interesting highlights in it? :)
ReplyDeleteVery inspiring comment Satu. I am really motivated now.
ReplyDeleteThere is one thing I don't completely understand; if our paper with 3.138 words is "waaaay too long for a blog post" how come your paper - or blog post has 3.939 words? Shouldn't it be shorter?
Yeah, I know, ours is too long too. And I'm sorry for that, my mistake, I forgot to do it and it would probably have been hard to combine everything together, so Robert ended up doing it i very short time. :(
ReplyDeleteBut let's say in general this kind of blog posts are too long. :P I've noticed while living in a blog world (e.g. last Tuesday I spend six (!) hours reading blogs) that nice and short keeps it going. Attention span of most of the people these days is very short.
This is THE number one invention that will help you read FASTER! If you read a lot, this is definitely the one for you:
ReplyDeletehttp://elitedaily.com/news/technology/this-insane-new-app-will-allow-you-to-read-novels-in-under-90-minutes/
Sebastjan I was also testing out that app and it definitely makes reading faster. And it doesn't seem to be very hard to implement on a web page either. The only doubts I'm having relate to the actual understanding of the text read in such a fast manner. Personally I often need to take pauses and really think about what I have read to understand it, especially when I try to learn something new by reading. For reading simple texts like news articles, this might be really great though!
ReplyDeleteHi!
ReplyDeleteHere’s some feedback on your first team assignment. Let me start by making a general comment that involves almost every team; The final reports have been quite lengthy overall. This is perfectly understandable since students who work hard like to demonstrate it by presenting a large amount of content. However, there is some real value in the difficult art of boiling things down to the essentials. Our suggestion is that you produce an impressive wealth of content in your work files inside Google Drive and then find clever ways to compress the information to the parts that really matter.
That said, I also have to commend the teams for producing thoughtful and interesting content in this task. I know you worked hard to figure everything out, collaborate efficiently and research your subjects thoroughly! Thank you for that.
As a final general note, most of you presented information about your sources, which was good. It would be even better, if you would reference those sources in the actual text, so that the readers can easily fact check your content. There are several different citation styles, of which two of the most common ones are Vancouver Referencing and Parenthetical referencing [1] The one I just used there is a form of Vancouver Referencing. If you make a thesis for TAMK you will be using Parenthetical referencing (TAMK Opinto-opas 2013). You can use the style you like. I personally prefer Vancouver referencing in square bracket subscript, which is also what Wikipedia is using. It makes the text clean and easy to read.
Here’s some feedback especially for the social media -team:
+Returned on time!
+Lots of good content
-Too much detail about work methods (things like how the team voted).
-Pretty long descriptions on three of the biggest social media platforms. The target group of this research is likely to already know all of this.
+Charts are very nice and there are many of them!
-Weird formatting of major headings (for example 4.5 is has a tiny font size compared to 4.41)
-I’m not sure I understand this sentence:
“Facebook and Twitter offer the possibility to upload pictures. From this research I found out Facebook is used mostly by younger persons and that Twitter's users is inclined more towards the middle aged persons. “
How does the possibility to upload pictures offer good data on the age of users? Could there better ways to research this data, like official statistics for example?
-Could really use some trimming/editing
Citations:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation
TAMK Opinto-opas 2013. Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulu. Read 7.4.2014.
http://opinto-opas.tamk.fi/
For some reason I did not see this post sooner, I apologize for that.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the + and - of our project here are my comments.
1) Too much detail about work methods (team voting)
From my point of view, I saw this task as a research paper, but also as an educational paper, that is why we wanted to be transparent and show how everything went from start to finish. The decision on what topic to approach was settled by voting, so we thought it should show up in the final paper (due to the educational purpose of this paper).
2) Long descriptions
Being a research paper and coming from different countries and universities, I think every university has a different way of creating research papers. At my university, where I studied before the Master, we were encouraged to describe topics in details. The reason why we were asked to do this is because people that are not up to date with the topic could catch up with the information. Yes, most of the people know about the biggest social networks, but there are people that do not realize the differences between them (at least I know people that don't). By describing the networks in a more detailed way, we could make sure that everyone understood the differences between these social networks.
3) Weird formatting
I think there was a problem when the document was opened, because the final paper that was submitted with formatting by sebastjen looked good on my PC (OpenOffice). I think that was a problem caused by the software used to open the document.
4) Sentence clarification
Regarding that sentence, yes, there are some studies that show target audience by age.
Here is the link to the research:
http://www.businessinsider.com/is-your-target-audience-on-twitter-facebook-or-linkedin-2010-2
It is not a very recent study, but it shows that younger people (between the age of 13 and 17) use Facebook more than Twitter.
The fact that twitter and facebook offer the possibility to upload pictures and share them, is a comparison with YouTube, that does not allow it's users to post their pictures. The age statistics were taken from articles like the one above. The statistics were taken from Quantcast.
I hope this clears all the minuses. If any of my team colleagues has anything to add, please do so.
Have a great day! :)
PS: Once again, sorry for the late response, I did not see the feedback only now.
I did not see the comments on here either, so I apologize too about not responding. I agree with everything Vlad wrote here. Well said Vlad, there's not much I would like to add on that.
ReplyDeleteAs Already said, the Long Descriptions are because team wanted to everyone reading it to have all the information needed. There are people that don't know about different social media platforms and the differences and similarities between them.
Thank you for your comments!
ReplyDeleteJust to clarify, it is definitely good to have documents about voting and such things in Google Drive, but it's just not necessary to include those details in the final report, if it's not relevant to the research questions.
The weird formatting I mentioned is visible above, in this blog post. You can still fix it if you want. :)
Feedback from Kseniya & Phu
ReplyDeletePositive:
The object of this particular research is one of the most interesting among all the reports. It is clear that the team has put a lot of effort to the research paper. The research description was detailed and the team has demonstrated the respect to the principles of democracy.
In overall the idea of quantitative research with good visual representation (tables, graphs) was terrific. Even though there are a lot of numbers in the report, it doesn't make readers confused.
Analysis of use social media in social media was well done and the comparison of the “social media circle” was excellent.
Constructive:
The Headlines is a bit difficult to follow, would be nicer to organise them in a way that the reader could understand easier whether they are in the facebook section of twitter or twitter section of facebook within first glance.